Darya Y. Darya Y.UX/UI & Product Designer
Case study

EdSyl: Your Personal Teaching Assistant

An AI-powered platform that helps teachers plan courses, lessons, and assessments. Structured, standards-aligned, and built around how teachers actually work.

EdSyl brand cover showing course, unit, and lesson planning cards
role

Product Designer

type

EdTech

AI Tools Curriculum Design Design Systems

Planning eats the time teachers should spend teaching

Teachers spend a surprising share of their time on admin and planning work instead of actual teaching: structuring courses, writing lesson plans, aligning content with educational standards, and creating assessments.

Existing AI tools didn't really solve this. Teachers had to figure out the right prompts themselves, lost track of scattered chat threads, and got unstructured output that still needed a lot of manual reorganizing to fit real teaching standards and practices.

The goal: design a product that lets teachers work with AI in an organized way, grounded in real educational standards and practices, without needing to know how to "talk" to AI.

Two tracks: what's already out there, and what "correct" actually looks like

I ran a competitive analysis alongside deep standards research, then surveyed teachers directly to check both against real classroom needs.

Content architecture mind map breaking a course into units, topics, and assessment types
Mapping the full content architecture, how a course breaks down into units, topics, and assessment types, before designing any screens.
Competitive analysis of tools like illumidesk, AutoClassmate, Teachino, and Lesson App
Breaking down existing tools, illumidesk, Syllabus Maker, AutoClassmate, Teachino, and others, to see what "AI-assisted planning" already looked like.
Curriculum standards research across Colorado, Missouri, Massachusetts, and international programs
Studying real curriculum frameworks, from state standards to international programs, to ground content generation in practices teachers already trust.
Feature prioritization matrix, critical versus not critical, do now versus do later
Sorting a long feature wishlist by what's critical and what can wait, to keep an MVP focused on the core planning workflow.

I also surveyed teachers directly to understand their biggest pain points in course and lesson planning: how much time it took, what tools they used, and what frustrated them most about existing solutions. These insights fed directly into feature prioritization and the courses → objectives → units → lessons content structure.

From research to a design question

Research pointed to two core needs: a guided structure instead of freeform chat, and content that's standards-aligned by default instead of generic AI output.

How might we

Let teachers create high-quality, standards-aligned course content quickly, without needing to know how to prompt an AI?

The answer took shape as a structured, guided workflow: teachers move through a clear content hierarchy, courses, objectives, units, lessons, with AI support built into each step, rather than a blank chat box.

Turning structure into a flow people can actually follow

Content architecture first

Mapped the full information architecture before any screens: how courses break into units, topics, assessment types, and objectives. This gave the AI-generation features a solid structure to plug into.

Detailed user flow chart for course and syllabus creation with AI and manual branches
The full course-creation flow, including AI Wizard and manual paths, objective regeneration, and syllabus editing.

A workspace that mirrors how teachers already think about a course

A workspace, not a document

The home dashboard organizes a teacher's Courses, Presentations, and Reviews, with a guided "How It Works" section introducing each capability. The layout adapts from a grid on desktop to a stacked list on mobile, keeping the same hierarchy across devices.

EdSyl home dashboard on desktop
EdSyl home dashboard on mobile

Every course, at a glance

Courses are shown as color-coded cards with grade, subject, and institution, letting teachers scan and jump into the right course fast, without digging through folders.

EdSyl courses list view

Structure stays visible at every level

A split-panel interface lets teachers navigate a course's units on one side while editing goals, objectives, and outcomes on the other. It's the same structure from the research phase, now directly editable in the UI.

EdSyl unit planning split-panel interface

From unit down to a ready-to-teach lesson

The same split-panel pattern repeats one level down: a list of lessons on the left, a full lesson plan (introduction, instructions, practice, summary, reflection) on the right.

EdSyl lesson planning interface

Turning a lesson into a check for understanding

Quizzes generate straight from a lesson's own objectives and content, with a simple control over question count. Teachers get a ready-to-print assessment aligned to what they already planned, instead of writing questions from scratch.

EdSyl quiz generator and printable quiz aligned to a lesson

AI suggestions you can actually review

Instead of a freeform chat, AI edits appear inline and reviewable: teachers see a proposed change, can refine it further, undo it, or apply it directly, with pagination when multiple suggestions are available. This came straight out of research: teachers didn't want to chat with AI, they wanted control over specific edits within their own content.

EdSyl AI agent showing a reviewable suggested edit

Built on Material Design 3

The interface was built on Material Design 3, customized to the product's needs, including a full state matrix across button and input variants, to keep things accessible and consistent as the product scaled across many screens.

Design system text field states
Design system button states

From prototype to part of a university's workflow

EdSyl launched successfully and was presented at several industry conferences, leading to a collaboration with a university. Teachers reported that the AI-assisted workflow felt comfortable and intuitive to use.

Why this one matters to me

I've been a teacher myself for over 10 years, so this project meant more to me than just another product to design. Watching teachers get back hours they used to lose to paperwork, and knowing that time could go toward actually resting, made every research call and design revision feel worth it.

What I'd do differently

Access to the survey data got cut short during the project. Next time I'd set up a lightweight, ongoing feedback loop earlier, even informal channels, so research insights stay available through the whole product lifecycle, not just the early discovery phase.